The role of emotional interpretants in Peirce’s theory of belief and doubt

Jean-Marie Chevalier

Abstract


The theory of emotional interpretant is mentioned only a few times in Peirce’s works. My hypothesis is that if Peirce did not develop this concept through and through, and reflected on it only very late in his writings, it is because it had been implicit in almost all his previous epistemological and semiotic works. The qualitative nature which defines belief and doubt makes the whole theory of inquiry rely on feelings, and is a consistent part of the characterization of beliefs as dispositions. In spite of this, objectivity is still preserved.

Includes: Comment. Emotion and belief by Henrik Rydenfelt (pp. 496–500).


Keywords


belief; disposition; doubt; emotional interpretant; feeling; interpretant; Charles Peirce; quale; Christoph von Sigwart

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.07





SIGN SYSTEMS STUDIES. ISSN 1406-4243 (print), 1736-7409 (online). E-mail: sss@ut.ee. Postal address: Sign Systems Studies, Dept. of Semiotics, University of Tartu, Jakobi St. 2, 51014 Tartu, Estonia